Equality California Institute tabulated survey responses and placed each responding school district into one of three tiers, reflecting how much progress each district reports having made in relation to the survey criteria. To provide an easily digestible summary of responses, we tabulated survey responses by subsection and translated each subsection point total into a corresponding color and icon.
To see how an individual school district responded to each of the survey questions, click on the district’s name in the interactive table below. To see a list of non-responding districts, please click here.
19
of 118 Responding School Districts
SPOTLIGHT DISTRICTS – TOP TIER
These school districts typically reported more extensive programs and policies to foster a safe and supportive school climate for LGBTQ students, including adopting anti-bullying and suicide prevention policies, cultural competency training programs, affinity groups like GSA clubs, inclusive access to facilities, and more.
For these districts, advocates should focus on improving programs and policies relating to bullying and suicide prevention, advocating for increased trainings for teachers and school staff, bolstering identity-affirming student groups, ensuring transgender and gender-nonconforming students have safe and inclusive access to facilities, and other things that might not be required by law but that go above and beyond in fostering an LGBTQ-inclusive school climate.
47
of 118 Responding School Districts
FOUNDATIONAL DISTRICTS – MIDDLE TIER
These school districts generally reported some basic or initial steps toward fostering a safe and supportive school climate for LGBTQ students, including adopting anti-bullying and suicide prevention policies and more. However, many of these districts did not report important markers of safe and supportive learning environments, such as cultural competency training programs, affinity groups like GSA clubs, or inclusive dress code policies.
For these districts, advocates should focus on ensuring comprehensive and enumerated policies are implemented, and assisting school districts in addressing resource or capacity limitations that may be hampering their ability to move forward.
52
of 118 Responding School Districts
PRIORITY DISTRICTS – LOWER TIER
These school districts have made modest initial steps toward fostering LGBTQ-inclusive school climate but may lack the resources, understanding or commitment to fully implement the programs and policies discussed in this report. These school districts generally reported little to no cultural competency training, few or no affinity groups like GSA clubs, non-inclusive dress code policies or facility access, lack of policies relating to name and gender changes, and under-inclusive curricula.
For these districts, advocates should focus on opposing programs and policies that are detrimental for LGBTQ students and guiding school districts to establish a foundation for comprehensive LGBTQ student equity by implementing metrics that are outlined in the Safe and Supportive Schools Survey.
KEY
| Anti-Bullying | Training | TGNC | Curriculum | Suicide Prevention | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spotlight | 54-69 | 49-81 | 14-17 | 16-23 | 26 |
| Foundational | 40-53 | 33-48 | 9-13 | 11-15 | 17-25 |
| Priority | 0-39 | 0-32 | 0-8 | 0-11 | 0-17 |
DATA
For all of these districts, advocates should confirm their districts’ responses are accurate, fill in gaps where needed, and work with their district to expand beyond the topics our survey covered toward innovative solutions for challenges these districts may be facing. Please submit any feedback or concerns about responses to SafeSchools@eqca.org.